My idea for this is that every 2 weeks or maybe every month for longer games (because I know a lot of people don't have that much free time), the forum chooses a game to play through together. I know of quite a few online sites of games and retro games on individual websites that can be played for free. A lot of these are shorter, so members won't have to invest a tremendous amount of time. Some are not even made with full stories or levels involved but with just a few short things to accomplish. In this way, there's a variety to experience without needing to spend weeks on each one.
In the future, we can expand this to the more popular games (such as the latest ones on consoles or acclaimed indie games on steam) that would need to be paid for.
The purpose would be to have a set limit of time to experience the game and then discuss it with everyone else in the community. What was the most fun part about it? What was the biggest design flaw?
We could even have a specific page on this site dedicated to our "community reviews". So each person that participates in the playthrough can respond with:
Time Spent:
Played to Completion: (Yes | No | N/A)
Rating: (Between 1-5 Stars)
Comments:
The page on this site where community reviews are stored would show the game's name, a screenshot of it (or a few), and a description below it.
Then it would includes these stats.
Average Rating:
Reviews: (The total amount here)
Lastly, the most recent review would be shown with the link to view all community reviews for the game.
To make this more interesting, maybe some exclusive adoptables could be provided specifically for members that take part in these playthroughs? I suppose I wouldn't mind drawing some.
Maybe there could be an attribute underneath user avatars titled "Reviews" and the amount that person has left on this site (for both playthrough games and otherwise).
If this community had something like this (essentially a book club but geared toward games), I would be more inclined to stick around, because then members would have a common goal and all get to discuss one game they're playing at the same time.
Every so often (if requested or desired), a playthrough may be opened up a subsequent time, allowing new members to have the "game club" experience with that same game. Their reviews would be taken into account on the game's page.
Who would partake in this?
In the future, we can expand this to the more popular games (such as the latest ones on consoles or acclaimed indie games on steam) that would need to be paid for.
The purpose would be to have a set limit of time to experience the game and then discuss it with everyone else in the community. What was the most fun part about it? What was the biggest design flaw?
We could even have a specific page on this site dedicated to our "community reviews". So each person that participates in the playthrough can respond with:
Time Spent:
Played to Completion: (Yes | No | N/A)
Rating: (Between 1-5 Stars)
Comments:
The page on this site where community reviews are stored would show the game's name, a screenshot of it (or a few), and a description below it.
Then it would includes these stats.
Average Rating:
Reviews: (The total amount here)
Lastly, the most recent review would be shown with the link to view all community reviews for the game.
To make this more interesting, maybe some exclusive adoptables could be provided specifically for members that take part in these playthroughs? I suppose I wouldn't mind drawing some.
Maybe there could be an attribute underneath user avatars titled "Reviews" and the amount that person has left on this site (for both playthrough games and otherwise).
If this community had something like this (essentially a book club but geared toward games), I would be more inclined to stick around, because then members would have a common goal and all get to discuss one game they're playing at the same time.
Every so often (if requested or desired), a playthrough may be opened up a subsequent time, allowing new members to have the "game club" experience with that same game. Their reviews would be taken into account on the game's page.
Who would partake in this?